Changes

I'd like to hear opinions about whether we should write separate articles for Amber and Lord Golden or just add all the details about them to the main Fool article. There would of course still be pages for Amber and LG, but they would redirect here. The same dilemma is with Fitz... should Tom Badgerlock have a separate article, or just a division in the Fitz article? I think I'd like to go for the one article + redirects option... but what is everyone else thinking? --[[User:Mervi|Mervi]] 02:54, 8 April 2006 (EEST)  :If we got more information on the made up backstories of Lord Golden/Amber,, I'd say we should have seperate articles, because that'd be fun and neat. With Tom, why don't we go with the redirect? it's not like LG and Amber, who were almost different people entirely. That is my two cents. XD [[User:Voici|Voici]] 00:32, 21 April 2006 (EEST)  ---- I think we should mention some of the Pale Women's comments, especially baring in mind she knew the Fool when he was a child. I'd have to get the book to confirm, but doesn't she go on about if she were with the Fitz they'd be man and women, hinting that Fitz and the Fool weren't? Maybe this is me just being weird and speculative. [[User:Voici|Voici]] 00:32, 21 April 2006 (EEST)