7,949
edits
Changes
m
need to divide information between articles
: I think we should try to include all the different view points from which to consider the Fool, so I'd say definitely yes. I think it would also be important to mention the paradox of two White Prophets at the same time, because that's not supposed to happen. Either one of them must be "false", but still they both exist and have at least the physical appearance of a WP. Although some of this might be more appropriate for the Pale Woman article or an article about the White Prophets, I guess. --[[User:Mervi|Mervi]] 02:12, 21 April 2006 (EEST)
:: I keep running into this problem. It needs to be mentioned in passing, at least. I think the only way to combat 'how much is too much' is by adding and editing until we get it right... [[User:Voici|Voici]] 17:09, 21 April 2006 (EEST)
----
I think the article is starting to look quite long already, and we're just in the beginning. :) IMO from now on, anything related to [[Amber]] and [[Lord Golden]] should be put to those two articles instead of this one. Let's keep this for the Fool of King Shrewd and the companion of Fitz, ok? :)
