7,949
edits
Changes
more thoughts about subcategories
=="The" in book titles and indexing==
About article headings and book names: I think we should do them in the library way (hey I work in one!). It means that The Golden Fool would be "Golden Fool, the", putting the article to be seen in the end, but allowing you to alphabetise (is that a word?) the book into the G instead of T. If you alphabetise (in Finnish aakkostat) books with the article in the beginning, T would be a one too large category. Hope you understand what I'm saying here?
: You're absolutely right. I'll go and change them on the trilogy pages and make redirects. Thanks for your input. :) --[[User:Mervi|Mervi]] 16:11, 26 April 2006 (EEST)
----
== One category/ manycategories==
Should we have subcategories for the different trilogies and series? --[[User:Mervi|Mervi]] 18:19, 28 April 2006 (EEST)
I just realized that "books" is not going to be a good/decrptive name for this category if we continue as we have started (we add to it short stories and the anthologies and magazines they were published in). Any suggestions? --[[User:Mervi|Mervi]] 20:02, 5 June 2007 (EEST)
: Works? [[User:Sini|Sini]]
:: Yeah, or I was thinking about "writings", or better yet, "publications". I guess it would be too complicated to make subcategories like magazines, anthologies etc? --[[User:Mervi|Mervi]] 01:22, 16 June 2007 (EEST)
How about if we divide this to subcategories, for example:
* top-level (can't decide on the name...)
** books (anything between two covers, whether it's by Hobb or not)
** stories (individual tales)
** writings (articles, essays etc by Hobb)
I don't know it this sounds too complicated... it would mean that certain articles now labeled only as books would be included in at least two subcategories. For example:
* Fair Folk, the -> books
* Grace Notes -> stories
* Fool's Errand -> books and stories
--[[User:Mervi|Mervi]] 10:52, 29 February 2008 (EET)
